Codex Task Logs

Let's check the root directory for the AGENTS.md file.

Looks like I need to navigate into the repo now.

I'll verify the repo structure and check for any instructions on using .venv/bin/activate.

I'll start by examining the contents of the repository. Let's see what's inside!

I'll start by checking out the server code to understand the tests.

I’ll start by looking around the build_query section to understand how it works.

I'll move forward and check the rest of the build_query function.

I'll take a look at the static JS file now.

I’m browsing the available order-by options to find what I need.

I'm scrolling further to view more features, like hitting 'Show Hits'. Let's check them out.

I'll look at line 440 and the surrounding area in view_settings.js.

I’m checking around line 693 and beyond to make sure I capture everything.

I'll examine timeseries_chart.js and table_view.js for the hits logic.

Timeseries_chart.js uses show_hits to adjust indices. I'll check the tests next.

I'll start by reviewing the test cases related to table order and hits.

I’m taking a look at the tests related to "order_by".

I’ll review the timeseries tests for the server now.

I'm skimming towards the end to check for additional tests.

The file may have ended earlier; let's explore tests/test_server.py to confirm.

I'll check "tests/test_server_basic" for query building and related hits.

I'm scrolling through more results to catch any relevant hits.

I'll search in tests/test_server_db_types.py for any relevant information.

I’ll check out test_server_errors.py to look for show_hits and related functions.

Continuing through the content to capture the remaining part I need.

I'll check out tests like test_web_table and test_web_timeseries for relevant information.

I'll start by searching for the function "show_hits" to understand its usage.

I'll take a look at lines 1-50 of tests/test_web_graph.py.

I'll open and review the tests in the test_web_timeseries.py file.

Want to find the show_hits section by scrolling to the very bottom.

I'm continuing to scroll to gather additional relevant details.

I'll check tests/test_web.py for relevant tests related to order and similar functionality.

I need to add ordering to "Samples", which will use COUNT(1) as the order basis. It should display even without selecting columns, just using the Hits column. "Show Hits" should remain client-side and not interrupt the COUNT(1) SQL query. Time series will handle group_by buckets too, calculating counts. I'll review build_query to make sure everything's aligned.

When using group_by or aggregation, count() should always compute, even when "Show Hits" is false. I'll ensure the server is computing the count() for "Samples" and ordering accordingly, regardless of displaying the Hits column.

The server must always compute count(*) for the "Hits" column, regardless of the show_hits flag. I'll modify the query to ensure Hits is computed for aggregated queries, but only shown when show_hits is true. Testing needs to reflect this change.

I'll review lines around 144 in tests/test_server_db_types.py to check the tests.

I'll check the test where show_hits is set to True, specifically in test_server_timeseries.

I'm scrolling to check the test details, focusing on lines after 18.

I'll continue scrolling past 118 lines to capture the timeseries_basic section.

I need to verify tests for show_hits and Hits and check the environment in pyproject.toml.

I need to add 'Samples' to the order_by options in view_settings.js. Let's check index.html for the select element.

I'll keep scrolling to locate the settings for 'order_by' and related parameters.

I'll check around line 184 in view_settings.js to investigate loadColumns' behavior.

I might need to scroll toward line 320 and beyond to capture everything.

I’ll search for where the show_hits UI is located.

I need to adjust loadColumns to make 'Samples' work as an alias for "Hits." I'll ensure the query orders by COUNT(1), using the alias. I'll update build_query to reflect this.

I’ll compute ‘Hits’ always, ensuring it's present, but leave it out of display if needed.

I need to ensure Hits is added to the query but handled differently on the client side.

It looks like run_query returns extra columns like Hits. I'll need to check how these interact with selectedColumns to avoid misalignment.

The "showTable" function doesn't seem to be in the export. I'll search for it.

I'm noticing a potential issue where rows could mismatch with selectedColumns, leading to undefined values.

I'll adjust collectParams to always send show_hits as True, regardless of the checkbox.

I'll send show_hits constant as true to the server and manage UI toggling separately.

I'll update showResults to remove Hits from rows if show_hits is unchecked for table/timeseries.

I'll set show_hits to true and check where showResults is defined, likely in table_view.js.

I'll adjust showResults to remove hits based on checkbox and graph type conditions.

I'll compute Hits column only if there's aggregation (has_agg) and adjust SELECT accordingly.

I'll keep sending "Hits" for compatibility, but don't display if show_hits is false.

Looks like the test computes hits when show_hits is True. I’ll add this always.

To pass, I’ll always insert "count(*) AS Hits" when necessary, but avoid duplication.

To avoid breaking tests, I’ll always compute count(*) but exclude Hits unless necessary.

The server should always include "Hits" in the query, even if hidden client-side.

Some tests expect Hits with show_hits True, others rely on its absence; updates needed.

I'll check out the test_web_table code around line 236.

I'm searching for occurrences of "aggregate=Avg" around lines 236-232, especially with 'Hits'.

I couldn't find "Hits"; I'll check tests/test_web_graph or other files instead.

The server update will change test expectations for rows. I'll adjust checks for length.

I'll check between lines 120 and 160 to double-check everything.

I'll search for "rows[0][1]" across the tests, especially in test_web_table.

I’ll focus on lines around 126 to explore the relevant code.

I’ll modify timeseries_count_no_columns to expect 3 columns and review other tests.

I need to add server and front-end tests to verify the new "Samples" order_by option.

Hmm, I see there are only 4 events, not 5 as I thought. I’ll inspect the full file.

I'll check the tests and query logic for show_hits and query patterns in server.py.

I'll start by opening 300 lines to look at "if params.show_hits".

I’ll check around line 508 where QueryParams are created to inspect show_hits functionality.

Looks like I'll update the UI to always send show_hits as True, while keeping the server unchanged.

I'll ensure the server always computes hits, updating tests to reflect new client behavior.

I'll modify the query to always compute hits and adjust tests for new behavior.

I'll adjust showResults to hide hits when necessary, updating tests for row length consistency.

After changes, results will include Hits; check test cases for row position dependence.

I'll scroll past 120 lines to check more tests, like timeseries_limit_applies_to_series.

I’ll look through tests to find where len(rows) or row lengths are checked.

I’ll look at tests/test_server_time.py to verify they don’t depend on row counts or positions.

I’ll add a 'Samples' option in loadColumns and adjust showHits related code in JS.

I'll continue scrolling past 56 to reach the timeseries_basic section.

Row checks will change due to added "Hits" column; confirm expected column placement.

The test expects the timestamp at index 1, but it'll now be at index 2.

It might be more effective to check a specific index, like "rows[0][2]", instead of a broader search.

They expect row[0][2] to stay as 40. I need to check for any other tests on index 1.

Checking specific lines: updates needed for timeseries and order_by tests, especially around users.

Since 'user' now moves to index 2, I'll update the assertion to check r[2].

I’m reviewing a test where the derived column was expected to match the aggregated value.

I’ll update the test to check r[3] == r[2] * 2 due to Hits changes.

The "login" row in the first index is unchanged in sample queries with no hits.

I'll review the row[0][1] check in the test case.

I'll add new tests for "order by samples" functionality in both table and timeseries, probably in test_server_timeseries.py. I'll validate the order by checking the data and SQL queries. Also considering timeseries behavior with grouping and ordering in the query.

I’ll make sure "Hits" is ordered within groups for tables, and adjust for timeseries aggregation.

For "Samples", I need to handle sorting by hits across groups, not individual rows.

I'll check if the code multiplies the limit by buckets after computing the bucket size.

I’ll test for "ORDER BY Hits" in SQL and verify that columns match expected data.

I’ll add tests to confirm "COUNT(*) AS Hits" in SQL and behavior when columns are empty.

I’ll update query generation to always compute Hits and test for proper column handling.

I'll add the 'Samples' option and modify showResults to hide Hits based on user selection.

I’ll adjust test indexes and add checks for "ORDER BY Samples" in server tests.

I need to adjust the build_query function inside server.py. Let's dive into that!

I'll replace "Samples" with "Hits" and add count(*) for "Hits" when has_agg.

I’ll update how 'order_by' works after 'has_agg,' mapping Samples to Hits. Time to patch.

I need to add a newline at the end. Let's run ruff format next.

I'm adding the "Samples" option to loadColumns in view_settings.js. Time to patch it!

I'll insert the new option after clearing orderSelect.innerHTML at the top.

I’ll modify showResults in table_view.js to hide Hits when ‘show_hits’ is unchecked.

I'll change showResults to exclude the 'hits' column.

Ruff format doesn't handle JS, so I'll skip it for JS files and run on server.py.

I’ve updated the tests as needed, including changes to test_server_timeseries.py. Time to patch.

I’ll update table_avg_with_timestamp, changing ts = parser.parse(rows[0][1]) to rows[0][2].

I'll adjust the code around the timeseries_count_no_columns section next.

I'm updating the rows to a length of 3, replacing lines 122 and beyond.

I removed the redundant lines but added the same ones plus a new one.

Time to modify the timeseries_derived_column function and proceed from there.

I'll change the condition to r[3] == r[2] * 2 as requested.

I'll add the new tests at the bottom of tests/test_server_timeseries.py, checking line numbers.

I’m adding tests for ordering samples and showing hits on the client side.

I'll format the file with ruff to tidy things up.

I’ll run a ruff check and pyright after updating tests for timeseries_count_no_columns.

I see a Pyright error regarding "payload" in test_server_timeseries.py. Time to investigate!

I’ll open the code near line 296 to inspect the pyright error.

I'll define payload: dict[str, Any] = { at line 296 to solve the error.

I'll add type annotations at lines 274 and 296. Time for a patch!

I'll verify the typing in show_hits_client_side for consistency.

I'll run ruff format once more to make sure everything's in shape.

Pyright keeps complaining about the list being of unknown type. I'll specify the payload as dict[str, Any] to resolve this. Let's confirm by double-checking lines 289-306.

It looks like the patch didn't fully apply, so I'll add the new variable at 296.

I'll give pyright another run.

The error persists at line 296. I'll revisit it to double-check.

It looks like the patch failed due to a quoting issue. I'll try again.

I think the patch wasn’t applied correctly. I'll check the raw file for inconsistencies.

I think the patch might not have updated due to quoting issues. Let's open it.

The patch wasn't inserted. I'll reopen the file between lines 280-310 to check.

Hmm, the patch didn’t apply due to possible spaces or path mismatch. Let's try again.

I'll run pyright once more to check for any issues.

Playwright tests fail due to missing 'rows' in API response, likely due to a 400 error. Server tests return 400 errors on 'Samples' as order_by because it's not recognized in selected columns. Checking if 'Hits' was correctly included in selected_for_order and verifying timing. Time to replicate.

The "order_by" column validation is causing the failure; I need to look at server.py.

I'll look into how 'order_by' is validated.

I’ll broaden my search to gather more relevant results.

It looks like the check is around lines 560-580. Let's review and adjust valid_cols.

I'll add 'Hits' to valid_cols, but leave out 'Count' for now to be safe.

I'll adjust test_sqlite_boolean_group_by to resolve an issue with the row format.

The test needs adjustments to match the added Hits column. I'll patch it now.

The error likely comes from mismatched handling of 'Hits' in the query. I'll open the test.

The 400 error could be due to missing 'rows' in lastResults or server changes.

The test might fail due to missing rows or issues with the 'Hits' column insertion.

I realized the user should be at index 1, not 2. I'll revert to assert all(r[1]=='alice').

I'll update the code to replace assert with r[1].

I'll check the 400 errors for 'Samples'. I'll focus on test_url_query_persistence.

The error seems related to missing or invalid parameters for 'samples' graph type.

I'll check how it behaves when no order_by is set; it likely defaults to None.

It looks like the error stems from the default 'Samples' option causing unexpected behavior.

I’ll add a default option for order_by after clearing innerHTML in loadColumns.

I'll add a default option for order_by before the samplesOpt.

I’ll skip running ruff format since it's not necessary, but will adjust failing tests.

I'll run the ruff check again to double-check for any issues.

I'll give the tests another shot. Let's hope they pass this time.

Tests failed with status 400; I'll check the response to figure out the issue.

I'll correct the order_by mapping by converting "Samples" to "Hits" earlier, before validation.

I'll add a mapping after assigning the parameters.

I'll map order_by to Hits after constructing the parameters.

I'll run the ruff check and rerun pyright to make sure everything's working.

I'll run the partial tests once more.

It's time to run the full test suite. Let's check everything thoroughly!

The test expects a 400, but the change now accepts 'Samples'. I'll review it.

Since "Hits" is now valid, the test should expect a 200 response. I'll patch it.

I'll run all tests again to confirm everything's working as expected.

Tests passed successfully. Time to commit these updates!

I missed including the status in the commit message. I'll double-check it now.

I'll reference the changes in server.py and include the corresponding line numbers in the summary.

I'll grab the JS snippet for the default orderSelect functionality.

I'll look at the snippet from table_view.js now.

Everything’s in place! Time to compose the PR with my changes.